The Entrepreneurial State: Rethinking Its Role in Driving Innovation Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/74m03w97Keywords:
Entrepreneurial State, innovation policy, government role in innovation, public R&D investmentAbstract
This article comprehensively explores the role of government in fostering innovation in key technologies and sectors, combining two opposing perspectives presented in The Entrepreneurial State and The Myth of the Entrepreneurial State. The Entrepreneurial State emphasizes the government’s active role in the innovation process, particularly in the early stages of high-risk R&D, where the government acts not only as a funding provider but also as a policymaker, supporting market-driven innovation. Conversely, The Myth of the Entrepreneurial State highlights the central role of markets and individuals in economic development and technological progress, arguing that the government’s role should be limited to creating a favorable environment for innovation. Integrating the content of both perspectives, this text begins by reviewing the government’s role in promoting modern innovation from two aspects: the objectives of government-led innovation promotion and the role it plays in the process of innovative activities. The government no longer directly leads innovation development but instead serves as a supportive actor, while the true driving force behind innovation stems from the creativity and exploratory spirit of individuals.
References
1. J. Hong, B. Feng, Y. Wu, and L. Wang, "Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China’s high-tech industries?" Technovation, vol. 57–58, pp. 4–13, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.06.001.
2. M. Greco, M. Grimaldi, and L. Cricelli, "Hitting the nail on the head: Exploring the relationship between public subsidies and open innovation efficiency," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 118, pp. 213–225, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.022.
3. R. Wieser, "Research and development productivity and spillovers: Empirical evidence at the firm level," J. Econ. Surv., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 587–621, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00260.x.
4. R. Kleer, "Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors," Res. Policy, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1361–1374, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.001.
5. P. Patanakul and J. K. Pinto, "Examining the roles of government policy in innovation," J. High Technol. Manag. Res., vol. 25, pp. 97–107, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2014.07.003.
6. Y. Wang, J. Li, and J. L. Furman, "Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China's Innofund program," Res. Policy, vol. 46, pp. 1142–1161, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.001.
7. M. Mazzucato, "The entrepreneurial state," Soundings, vol. 49, no. 49, pp. 131–142, 2011, doi: 10.3898/136266211798411183.
8. G. Arcuri, "Lessons from Russia's dysfunctional pre-war innovation economy," CSIS, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.csis.org/blogs/perspectives-innovation/lessons-russias-dysfunctional-pre-war-innovation-economy?v=zgzkoldversionview.
9. D. N. McCloskey and A. Mingardi, The myth of the entrepreneurial state. American Institute for Economic Research, 2020, ISBN: 139781630692094.
10. P. Bardhan, "Corruption and development: A review of issues," J. Econ. Lit., vol. 35, pp. 1320–1346, 1997, doi: 10.4324/9781315126647-30.
11. D. Acemoglu, U. Akcigit, N. Bloom, and W. R. Kerr, "Innovation, reallocation, and growth," NBER Working Paper, no. w18993, 2013, doi: 10.1257/aer.20130470.
12. P. A. David, B. H. Hall, and A. A. Toole, "Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econo-metric evidence," Res. Policy, vol. 29, pp. 497–529, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6.
13. Deloitte Center for Government Insights with the Council on Competitiveness, "Revisiting the government’s role in catalyzing modern innovation: A toolkit for public sector organizations to energize ecosystems and spur innovation," Deloitte Insights, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/role-of-government-in-innovation.html.
14. W. Li, G. S. Ahmad, W. Yang, S. M. Adeel, and S. M. Ramzan, "Proactive personality and innovative behavior at work: A jux-taposition of Schumpeter’s innovation theory and broaden-and-build theory," Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.927458.
15. P. Aghion and A. Festré, "Schumpeterian growth theory, Schumpeter, and growth policy design," J. Evol. Econ., vol. 27, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00191-016-0465-5.
16. A. Cerqua and G. Pellegrini, "Do subsidies to private capital boost firm growth? A multiple regression discontinuity design approach," J. Public Econ., vol. 109, pp. 114–126, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.005.
17. H. T. Nguyen, T. T. D. Vu, H. M. Nguyen, D. B. P. Nguyen, and H. P. Nguyen, "SMEs’ innovation and government support during the COVID-19 pandemic," J. Asian Bus. Econ. Stud., Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JABES-08-2023-0300.
