Research on the Connotation Development of Multi-Scholarship Policy System for Postgraduates Under the New Situation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/sv5h2a63Keywords:
postgraduate scholarship, award and assistance system, connotation developmentAbstract
Under the background of full tuition for graduate education, the scholarship system is an important measure for graduate students to obtain study life security and stimulate their enthusiasm for scientific research, and it is also an important part of the postgraduate training system. Through the analysis, it is found that there are some problems in the postgraduate scholarship policy system, such as being out of touch with ideological and political education, imperfect system construction and unclear ideological efficiency. To continuously establish and improve a long-term and diversified policy system for graduate students' scholarships will help to fully stimulate the vitality of graduate education and promote the development of graduate education quality. In addition, the research strives to make the postgraduate scholarship system more diversified, further improve the quality of postgraduate training, and run the education-supporting work through the whole process of postgraduate training to promote the sustainable and healthy development of postgraduate education. Constantly establishing and perfecting a long-term and diversified policy system for postgraduate awards and assistance will help to fully stimulate the vitality of postgraduate education and promote the development of postgraduate education quality.
References
1. N. Wald and T. Harland, "Students as scholars and the scholarship of student learning," Teach. High. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 442–453, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2021.1989583.
2. N. D. Lestari et al., "Navigating educational crossroads: Unveiling the cultural journey of Indonesian graduate students in European scholarship programs," Indones. J. Learn. Adv. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 105–122, 2024, doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v6i1.23055.
3. F. Rohden, T. Bailey, and S. Laframboise, "20 years of choices: A fight for increased funding for graduate students," Biochem. Cell Biol., vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 346–350, 2024, doi: 10.1139/bcb-2024-0029.
4. P. Hunter, "Undergraduate research: Winning the battle for students' hearts and minds," EMBO Rep., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 717-719, 2007, doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401039.
5. J. M. Nicholson, "Collegiality and careerism trump critical questions and bold new ideas: a student's perspective and solution. The structure of scientific funding limits bold new ideas," Bioessays, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 448-450, 2012, doi: 10.1002/bies.201200001.
