Research on the Application of Signal Integration Model in Real-Time Response to Social Events
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/2n01jq04Keywords:
signal integration model, social events, real-time response, decision support, application effect evaluationAbstract
With the increasing complexity of social events, how to quickly respond and make precise decisions in a dynamic and changing environment has become a key issue in the field of public management. The signal integration model, as an advanced information fusion technology, greatly improves the timeliness of event responses and the quality of decision-making by summarizing information from various data sources. This article deeply analyzes the application of signal integration models in handling social events, and explores the specific roles of the models in information collection, data synthesis, real-time response, and decision assistance. In the practical application stage, this article focuses on how to apply the signal integration model in social events, including how to integrate diverse signal sources, establish a rapid response system, and optimize decision-making processes. Through empirical analyses on multiple instances, the signal integration mode has been evaluated in terms of response speed, decision assistance effectiveness, and practical operational feedback. Research has suggested that the signal integration mode not only significantly improves the efficiency of responding to social events, but also enhances the accuracy of decision-making, providing solid technological support and theoretical basis for handling similar events in the future.
References
1. D. Arthur and B. Pascal, "A GPU algorithm for agent-based models to simulate the integration of cell membrane signals," Acta Biotheoretica, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10441-019-09360-0.
2. M. Issa, M. Rezkallah, A. Ilinca, and H. Ibrahim, "Grid integrated non-renewable based hybrid systems: Control strategies, optimization, and modeling," in Hybrid Technologies for Power Generation, Academic Press, 2022, pp. 101-135. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823793-9.00004-8.
3. F. Uliana, R. Ciuffa, R. Mishra, et al., "Phosphorylation-linked complex profiling identifies assemblies required for Hippo signal integration," Mol. Syst. Biol., vol. 19, no. 4, p. e11024, 2023. doi: 10.15252/msb.202211024.
4. C. M. Rocco and B. Kash, "A bi-objective model for network restoration considering fairness and graph signal-based func-tions," Life Cycle Reliab. Safety Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 299-307, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s41872-023-00233-7.
5. N. Rouhani, D. Clewett, and J. W. Antony, "Building and breaking the chain: A model of reward prediction error integration and segmentation of memory," J. Cogn. Neurosci., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2401–2414, 2024. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02215.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ziwei Liu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.