The Impact of Teacher Feedback on Student Motivation in Online Learning Environments: A Study Based on Self-Determination Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/syf4kg35Keywords:
teacher feedback, self-determination theory (SDT), online learning, self-efficacy, learning engagement, mixed-methods researchAbstract
This study investigates the impact of teacher feedback on students' learning motivation, self-efficacy, and engagement in online learning environments. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the research explores how different types of feedback — cognitive, affective, and metacognitive — satisfy students' psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative experimental data with qualitative interview insights. The findings reveal that affective feedback significantly enhances emotional engagement and self-efficacy, while metacognitive feedback promotes self-regulated learning and long-term retention. Cognitive feedback, though effective in improving task performance, has a limited impact on motivation unless paired with emotional or metacognitive elements. The study also highlights the importance of timely, personalized, and multimodal feedback in online education. These results provide practical implications for educators and online learning platforms, suggesting that optimizing feedback strategies can significantly improve student outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by integrating SDT with empirical research on feedback in online education, offering a framework for designing feedback practices that address students' psychological needs.
References
1. X. Pan and H. Shao, "Teacher online feedback and learning motivation: Learning engagement as a mediator," Soc. Behav. Pers. an Int. J., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1-10, 2020, doi. 10.2224/sbp.9118.
2. N. T. T. Thai, B. De Wever, and M. Valcke, "Face‐to‐face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions," J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 397-411, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12423.
3. S. G. T. Ong and G. C. L. Quek, "Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment," Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 681-707, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5.
4. S. M. Yong and L. S. Thi, "Online learning motivation during Covid-19 pandemic: The role of learning environment, student self-efficacy and learner-instructor interaction," Malaysian J. Learn. Instr., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 213-249, 2022, doi: 10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.8.
5. L. K. Fryer and H. N. Bovee, "Supporting students' motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline," Internet High. Educ., vol. 30, pp. 21-29, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003.
6. J. Jeon and S. Lee, "Teachers’ use of motivational strategies in the synchronous online environment: A self-determination theory perspective," Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 11963-11986, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11656-1.
7. H. C. K. Hsu, C. V. Wang, and C. Levesque-Bristol, "Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment," Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2159-2174, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w.
8. Z. Wang, S. Y. Gong, S. Xu, and X. E. Hu, "Elaborated feedback and learning: Examining cognitive and motivational influences," Comput. Educ., vol. 136, pp. 130-140, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.003.
9. S. A. Al Hashimi and Y. Zaki, "Students’ perceptions of online assessment, feedback practices, and challenges," Int. J. Eval. & Res. Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1939-1949, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22753.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zhi Wang (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
