A Study of Imparities between Chinese Painting and Western Painting from Perspectives of Arts and Cultures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/1h1t7s34Keywords:
Chinese painting, Western painting, artistic traditions, cultural differences, aesthetic expressionAbstract
In the context of global art history, Chinese and Western painting have developed as two of the most influential artistic traditions, shaped by their unique cultural, philosophical, and historical trajectories. This study examines the disparities between Chinese and Western painting, rooted in their distinct historical evolutions and cultural philosophies. It investigates the materials, tools, artistic purposes, and expressions of space that define these traditions. Chinese painting reflects harmony between nature and humanity, often employing symbolic representation and leaving space for subjective imagination. In contrast, Western painting values realism, with detailed depictions of the natural and human worlds rooted in rational observation. The analysis highlights the influence of Taoist, Confucian, and Buddhist philosophies on Chinese art, while Western painting derives inspiration from religious themes and humanism. By comparing these distinct systems, this study underscores the richness of global artistic diversity and advocates for cultural appreciation and mutual learning.
References
1. M. Turner, "Classical Chinese landscape painting and the aesthetic appreciation of nature," J. Aesthetic Educ., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 106-121, 200, doi: 10.2307/40263708.
2. R. Chen and Y. Liu, "A study on Chinese audience’s receptive behavior towards Chinese and western cultural hybridity films based on grounded theory—taking Disney’s animated film Turning Red as an example," Behav. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 135, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bs13020135.
3. B. Nir, "Pro-dominion attitudes toward nature in western culture: First cracks in the narrative," Genealogy, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 68, 2020, doi: 10.3390/genealogy4030068.
4. Z. Hu, S. Josef, Q. Min, M. Tan, and F. Cheng, "Visualizing the cultural landscape gene of traditional settlements in China: a semiotic perspective," Heritage Sci., vol. 9, pp. 1-19, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40494-021-00589-y.
5. S. Liu, J. Yang, S. S. Agaian, and C. Yuan, "Novel features for art movement classification of portrait paintings," Image Vis. Comput., vol. 108, p. 104121, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2021.104121.
6. S. McCausland, The Art of the Chinese Picture-Scroll. London, U.K.: Reaktion Books, 2023. ISBN: 9781789148343.
7. Y. Chao, "Recognizing the Impact of Daoism on Song Dynasty’s Landscape Painting," Commun. Humanit. Res., vol. 4, pp. 662–667, May 2023, doi: 10.54254/2753-7064/4/20221027.
8. L. Liu, "The basic features of traditional Chinese landscape painting," in The 5th International Conference on Art Studies: Research, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2021), vol. 1, pp. 17-27, Amsterdam University Press, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.5117/9789048557240/ICASSEE.2021.003.
9. M. Sullivan, "Pictorial art and the attitude toward nature in ancient China," Art Bull., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 1954, doi: 10.2307/3047525.
